Lothal and Its Shipyard: 4,500 Years Before Our Engineers


I am Breton — born in Saint-Brieuc, on the seashore. I grew up around sailors. And when I first saw the descriptions and reconstructions of Lothal’s “port,” something immediately struck me as wrong. A port in the middle of the land? With no view of the sea? I put the question to people who know about these things.

Their answers changed the way I read this site.

Lothal: the city at the crossroads

Lothal is one of the best-excavated sites of the 7 Rivers civilisation. It lies in the state of Gujarat, in the region that was probably the most commercially active in the entire civilisation — the one that exported by sea toward the Persian Gulf, Arabia, and Mesopotamia.

The city is built of fired bricks, with a drainage system, residential quarters, craft zones — everything found in the great cities of the civilisation. But what makes Lothal singular is this immense rectangular structure, still clearly visible today, which archaeologists long called a “port” or a “boat basin.”

A port in the middle of the land?

When I described this structure to Breton sailors — renowned for their knowledge of the sea, ports, and coastlines — their reaction was unanimous: it makes no sense. A sea port always faces the sea, or is directly accessible from it. You do not build one in the middle of the land. It would be absurd from a practical standpoint.

Their hypotheses? Either a fish trap — a structure that retains water to facilitate fishing — or, the hypothesis that struck them as most credible, a shipyard. The place where you build boats, not the place where they dock.

I have held this sailors’ intuition for years. And not long ago — after my translation was already complete — Indian archaeologists confirmed this reading: the Lothal structure is very probably a shipyard. Not a commercial port, not a mooring basin. A place of construction.

What this changes

The distinction is not trivial. A shipyard implies an organised maritime industry. Shipwrights, specialised tools, transported materials, plans — or at least technical traditions passed from master to apprentice. Sophisticated division of labour.

And the texts confirm that the 7 Rivers civilisation did export by sea. Sumerian cuneiform tablets mention Meluhha — the name Mesopotamians gave to this civilisation — with references to regular commercial exchanges. 7 Rivers-style steatite seals have been found in Bahrain and Mesopotamia. The maritime route existed. You need ships to travel it. And to build ships, you need a shipyard.

And the real port, then?

All rivers flow to the sea. The Sarasvatī and the Indus are no exception. The 7 Rivers civilisation had seaports — but they were not inland.

My hypothesis, shared by some archaeologists, is that the great port of the Sarasvatī lay at Bet Dwarka, in Gujarat — today under the sea. Divers have discovered what looks like a loading quay beneath the water at that location. Unfortunately, this underwater site has not yet been seriously studied. We will learn more in the years ahead, I hope.

In the meantime, Lothal remains the most visible testimony to the maritime capacity of this civilisation. Not as a port of call — but as a cradle of shipbuilding. Something Breton engineers would probably have recognised at a glance.

4,500 years ahead

What fascinates me about Lothal is less the technical achievement itself than the logic underlying it. This civilisation understood, 4,500 years ago, that a major commercial power needs maritime infrastructure. It organised the production of vessels, structured sea trade, and maintained commercial networks across thousands of kilometres.

Without an army. Without an empire. Without a pharaoh or absolute king. Just a collective organisation in the service of commerce and exchange.

Perhaps that is the real mystery of Loth The city that exported its surpluses by caravan and by sea → Dholavira: the City That Tamed the Rain

The city that exported its surpluses by caravan and by sea → Dholavira: the City That Tamed the Rain

Rakhigarhi, the largest site on the Sarasvatī → Rakhigarhi: the Largest Site, and the Most Overlooked

The contemporary text that mentions neither palaces nor war → What the Rig Veda Does Not Contain

Hervé Le Bevillon's avatar

By Hervé Le Bevillon

Traducteur du Rig Veda - Je n'ai pas suivi le cursus habituel des sanskritistes du 19 ème et du 20 ème siècles, par contre j'ai bu le soma, et toute la différence est là. Cette traduction m'a permis de comprendre comment était la civilisation dont le rig veda était le livre (oral).

Leave a comment